For Michelin, the unthinkable has happened. The French company is no longer supplying Dani Pedrosa with tyres. Announced after the Misano race, such a mid-season change is unprecedented, and unlikely to bear immediate fruit, as the Rossi side of the Fiat Yamaha garage can testify, because the Honda will need to be set up to make best use of the new rubber.
The decision seems a bizarre one, almost desperate, and the agreement of the tyre companies and Honda to the change even more so. Let’s put this in perspective and try to pick apart the bones of the deal; Pedrosa was leading the championship on Michelins up until July 14th, when he fell off at turn 1 of the Sachsenring in heavy rain. That’s race 10 and well past half-way through the season. He was also 7.4 seconds ahead after just 5 laps. He broke his wrist in the fall and this has hampered his challenge ever since.
Unable to ride in Laguna Seca, he lost points. In the Czech Republic, Michelins were not the tyre to be on. Even Michelin stalwart Edwards was complaining, and Bibendum had his worst competitive moment since the 2005 US F1 race when they withdrew their tyres and only the six Bridgestone runners made the start line. However, in Misano Michelin recovered. Bridgestone won the race, but Michelin and Bridgestone alternated all the way down the top ten positions, including Pedrosa in 4th place.
Behind the scenes Albert Puig, Pedrosa’s manager, attempted to organise a boycott of the Czech race by all Michelin runners, according to the reliable Dennis Noyes. Puig also runs the MotoGP Academy for Dorna and has a role in the running of the Repsol Honda team. As Noyes points out, Dorna can not have been too happy with his meddling.
This story began back in the 2007 season. Pedrosa fought for Bridgestones for ‘08 and was looking likely to get them, supported by HRC until Mr. Fukui, the head of Honda worldwide overruled the idea of a switch away from their loyal tyre suppliers of so many seasons and victories on the basis of one bad season. This time, it appears that there may have been more at stake.
It seems likely that the move to allow Pedrosa onto Bridgestone is part of an agreement by both the tyre companies and Honda to avoid a single-tyre regulation for 2009. Michelin will have wanted to fight to keep both Repsol Honda bikes, and Bridgestone have previously stated that they are unable to supply more riders (the initial reason for resisting the supply to Rossi). However all parties, Honda included, are reluctant to see a control tyre introduced, and this capitulation to the demands of Puig/Pedrosa may very well be a credible alternative to keep Michelin and Bridgestone at the party next year. The tyre companies, brought to the brink of regulation for 2008 over the supply of Rossi have avoided such a showdown this time. Will this be enough to prevent the seemingly-inevitable slide to one make of rubber for 2009?